Framing is when a news story selects some aspects of a
perceived reality and makes them more salient in the media text. Believe it or
not, every story you see in the news is framed in a certain way. There are
numerous ways in which the media frames a story and it depends on what the story
is about. The most common frames used in the news are conflict, consequences,
perspective, responsibility, and values. The conflict frame is usually applied
to zero-sum issues where two groups are in conflict with each other and when
the conflict is settled one side will lose something and the other will gain
something. The consequences frame is when the story focuses on the consequences
of a popular habit or action. The perspective frame is showing a single
perspective amidst a certain event or crisis. The responsibility frame seeks to
place the responsibility or blame for something on someone or something.
Lastly, the values frame focuses on and somewhat exploits the mainstream values
of a population.
Framing
is closely related to agenda setting but it is not the same. While agenda
setting tells the audience what to think about, framing guides the audience on
how to think of the issue being proposed. Framing, in the most common form, has
four components: 1. It promotes a particular problem or issue 2. It interprets
the cause of that problem or issue. 3. It evaluates the moral implications the
problem or issue may hold. And, 4. It recommends a solution or treatment to the
problem or issue.
Food Waste Is Becoming Serious Economic and Environmental Issue, Report Says- The New York Times
Food Waste Grows With the Middle Class- The New York Times
In these articles published in The New York Times, the issue being presented is the growing concern of food waste and how it is impacting the world we live in. This story is framed using the consequences frame and it illustrates the consequences of wasting food. This story has all four components of framing in explaining why food waste is a problem.
1. 1.
Promotes particular problem: In this article the
problem being presented is about the amount of food being wasted by growing
number of people in the middle class. It addresses the fact that the cost of
disposing of all this food is in the hundreds of billions of dollars and also
its impact on global warming.
2. 2.
Causal interpretation: The cause of this problem
in this story is because the middle class is growing in the United States, and
the middle class wastes the most food of all social classes. They also note
that retailers are also throwing away mass amounts of food that is expired.
3. 3.
Moral Evaluation: This story pulls on moral
concerns by emphasizing the cost of disposing this food (which is about $400
billion) and also the effect it is having on the environment with the emission
of methane gas.
4. 4.
Treatment Recommendation: The recommendation
this story proposes is the presence of anti-waste groups which have been
effective in other areas. The story also notes that in 15 years, if anti-waste awareness
is employed, it could save the world $120 billion to $300 billion a year.
These articles are a good example
of framing and also cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is when
discomfort is felt at a discrepancy between what someone already knows or
believes, and new information or interpretation. These articles attempt to
present new information to the audiences in hope that they will change the way
they live.
I think your blog post provides a great understanding of framing, and also I really like the way you set up your blog post. I think the definitions to start, then the article link, and ending with the four components of framing is awesome. I would like to get a little more information on the topic though and an explanation of relevance for cognitive dissonance here.
ReplyDelete